Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
November 4, 2009
In a report posted on the Wired website, Noah Shachtman mentions a CIA plan to hunt down and kill “jihadists, drug dealers, pirates and other enemies of the state.” Shachtman cites a report produced by the U.S. military’s Joint Special Operations University suggesting a global assassination team. “Report author and retired Lt. Col. George Crawford instead would like to see a permanent group with clear authority, training, doctrine and technology to go after these dangerous individuals,” writes Shachtman.
 |
|
| The National Guard has trained to take on “militias” as dangerous domestic terrorists. | |
Beyond the obvious illegality of such a program — executing assumed terrorists and drug dealers without the benefit of trial — the suggested murder program has another big problem. It would allow the government to define who is an enemy of the state.
The now infamous DHS report on domestic terrorism defines militias, returning veterans, and Second Amendment activists as dangerous extremists who pose a threat to the national security of the country. For several months the corporate mockingbird media has engaged in a concerted campaign to characterize “rightwing” activists as an ominous threat. Open-carry activists protesting at Obama events were characterized as a threat to the president.
In July, the Missouri National Guard trained to engage in combat with militia groups. The Kansas City-based 205th Area Support Medical Company and the Springfield-based 206th Area Support Medical Company trained to fend off attacks while performing their medical duties,” a Pentagon writer reported on June 30.
In April, the Maryland National Guard was put on alert in anticipation of Tea Party protests, revealing that the government considers constitutional activists to be “insurgents” and “militants,” Infowars reported.
In March, the United States Army Reserve Command published a Force Protection Advisory recommending “situational awareness” and “mitigation measures” in response to End the Fed protests.
On November 22, 2008, Alex Jones led a rally at the Federal Reserve Bank in Dallas Texas. The Dallas protest is specifically mentioned in the official Army document. Ron Paul’s brother was also in attendance. The event was monitored by the Pentagon.
On June 15, Infowars reported on a Department of Defense multiple choice test that defined constitutionally protected protests as “low-level terrorism.”
Rex 84, Operation Chaos, COINTELPRO, Garden Plot, Rose Bush, Punch Block, Steep Hill, Lantern Spike, Quiet Town, Gram Metric, Cable Splicer, and numerous other military and intelligence programs and operations have consistently characterized law-abiding Americans as terrorists and “enemies of the state.”
The CIA may kill a few patsies in the “global war on terror” in order to create the impression of a threat to the homeland. The CIA not only created, organized, and funded al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and other false flag terrorist organizations, it also runs deadly drugs for the banksters on Wall Street. Carlos Lehder, Pablo Escobar, Amado Fuentes, Matta Ballesteros and Hank Rohn — these are employees for the offshore bankers that make billions laundering illegal drug money. The CIA and proxy governments may assassinate them for propaganda purposes, but they will not shut down the lucrative international drug cartel business.
The real “enemies of the state” are the American people, not African pirates and drug dealers. It remains to be seen if the government will assassinate leaders of the patriot movement in the United States.
We may be one major staged false flag terror event away from finding out, especially if such an event is attributed to American citizens.
#1 by Gavin on 11/20/2009 - 10:54 PM
Quote
Well, it obviously doesn’t take much research to write on this site, does it? I just read the Schachtman article at Wired. Then I clicked on the link for the original report: http://jsoupublic.socom.mil/publications/jsou/JSOU09-7crawfordManhunting_final.pdf Clearly, unlike Schachtman, Kurt Nimmo didn’t check the sources before blogging an uninformed opinion. First point: search the original report for the term “enemies/enemy of the state”. Nada. Zilch. Zippo. Not in there. Just violent extremists, narcotraffickers, and pirates — the very problems we’re dealing with in the 21st Century. Second point: read the bio on the original author, Col Crawford. This guy’s a war hero. While we’ve been busy in the comfort of our homes, our only patriotism an occasional tap on a computer keyboard, this guy put his life on the line to ensure we could keep up our brainless babble. Third point: if you read the original report, you’ll find that this experienced soldier emphasizes the alternatives to killing. This is an officer who admonishes the reader with Jeffersonian quotes like “I’d rather suffer the inconveniences of too much liberty than those attending too little liberty…” The Wired article was trying to cause a sensation — it’s pretty clear ol’ Kurt drank the Kool-Aid and decided to write a not-so-thought piece based on what one guy said about what another guy said about a report some guy wrote. By contrast, the original report has over three-hundred endnotes. At least one of the fellows referred to in these pages bothered to read before he spoke… will the real patriot step forward? Take a bow, Colonel.